New Energy Research
Project Ixion - Free Energy Converter

©2007 Ing.Xavier Borg

Project Ixion - Development of a Free energy system

One of the predictions which identifies EMRP gravity theory from all the rest, is that highly energetic, extra galactic, electromagnetic waves in Planck frequency region, usually referred to by today's scientists as the vacuum fluctuations, or zero point energy, can be converted into useful work. Three different free energy technologies stem out directly from this principle, one based on electrostatic conservative fields, one based on magnetic conservative fields and one on gravitational conservative fields which according to EMRP are nothing but electromagnetic fields, all three of which are nothing but direct manifestations of vacuum energy field gradients.

Science and Belief

Science is all about arriving to the most correct theory through a logic process. Belief is about accepting the truth through direct experience, or one that comes to us from reputable, respectful and thrustworthy sources. Without any kind of believe or faith, one would have to go through all logic behind the issue and confirm that the logic is really correct. This may be time consuming but most of the time worth the trouble to eliminate some hidden believe residing at the foundations of a new theory. When one accepts an idea, either because it's printed all over his physics textbooks, or because his favourite mad scientist declared it as true, or for whatever other plausible reason, one is said to believe in that statement. Believing does not require a person to understand the concept. As one may correctly argue, such beliefs might range from the most false to the most correct logic, and sometimes it may not be easy to discriminate between these two if one does not apply some reliable method to do so. For example, until someone does not come up with a way to prove the logic behind the theory, science cannot explain whether it's the chicken or the egg that came first, so to date we can either believe there once existed a very first egg, a very first chicken, and even make up our own theories, but such theories will only obtain the status of hypothesis unless they are logically proven in a scientific way. Such a way has been used over the years to discriminate between good and bad science, and if properly implemented may be used to draw the line between science which is or is not consistent with reality. This is called the scientific method. It basically consists of four simple stages: observation, hypothesis, prediction, replicability. The order of these stages will also affect the 'strength' of the idea, for if the observation follows a theoretical prediction, then, that same prediction gets even stronger than one that had to be made up to explain some previously unexplained observed anomaly. In both cases, however, an idea validated using all four stages of the scientific method becomes part of science, and is no longer just a hypothesis or believe.

With project Ixion I was lucky enough to have developed a backing theory, the EMRP theory, which produced several experimental predictions. Before applying the scientific method, such predictions could only be treated as potentially good hypothesis, but which could also be disproved depending on the outcome of further experimentation. Experiments are the most important tool to detect completely wrong hypothesis, and thus stop wasting any more time and money on the wrong track. If experimental data shows that there might be something that agrees with our original prediction, then, it would be a good sign and encourages the scientist to proceed with the following stages, and may also be used to refine the original theory. Even if experimental data shows to be 100% consistent with the predicted effects, data on its own is not enough for the idea to cross the line between belief and science. This stage applies both for ideas undergoing such analysis as well to well established theories, in which case such theory may get downgraded or completely erased from science. For example, if one simple experiment shows results which are incompatible with the most revered theory of our present science, that theory automatically gets downgraded to belief status. In history we have seen well established theories which were later found to be completely wrong, and others which have been found to be incomplete. A well known example of the latter are Newton's laws which break down at relativistic speeds. If prediction was not the first stage in the validating process, then, the experimental results should at that stage be used to attain some sort of theory which logically explains the hypothesis taken in the first stage, and must preferably be used to obtain further predictions which pass all stages within the scientific method. If all started off from a theoretical prediction, than the more credible becomes the original theory. The more predicted results become experimentally validated, the closer a theory gets to real science. The final stage is to draw up a concise description for all independent experimenters to properly perform at least one experiment which should show that the original prediction or hypothesis was correct, and is no longer to be treated as a pet theory, freak anolamy or belief. If the predicted results are not consistently reproduced by others, than, the theory cannot be part of science, and other ways have to be deviced in order to succesfully go through the replication stage. For this reason it is very important for the scientist to explain in great detail the procedure and equipment used during the experimentation stage which had originally shown positive results. As we have said, even with all the weight of experimental evidence from experiments and predictions, a scientific theory can never obtain the status of absolute truth and can be disproved at anytime using the same method. When a theory is introduced to students in such a way that its collapse or downgrade is not to be considered as scientifically possible, or that even speaking of such a possibility may be considered as a heresy, then that theory would unfortunately have obtained the status of a scientific dogma. Sometimes scientific dogmas and paradigmes are the weapons used by science 'politics' to keep a new valid theory from being exposed to the scientific community. If you reached these pages because you are a science explorer, then, applying the scientific method yourself might be the only way left for you to decide whether what you read here are just hypothesis or valid theories.


Newton's questions on magnetic and gravitational fields

Almost completely unknown, is the fact that Newton did serious considerations on the topic of free energy from background currents of what he considered as invisible matter. This he expected to manifest itself in both magnetic and gravitational fields. In one of his unpublished documents 'Questiones quædam Philosophiæ' he listed several experimental enquiries. Newton regarded gravity as caused by the descent of a subtle invisible matter striking all bodies, carrying them down.

Newton's enquiries regarding perpetual gravitational motion

"Try whither the weight of a body may be altered by heate or cold, by dilatation or condensition, beating , poudering, transfering to severall places or severall heights or placing a hot or heavy body over it or under it or by magnetisme whither leade or its dust spread abroade, whither a plate flat ways or edg ways isn heaviest, whither the rays of gravity may bee stopped by refecting or refracting them, if so a perpetuall motion may bee made one of these two ways.
The gravity of bodys is as their solidity, because all body{s} descend equall spaces in equal {times} consideration being had to the Resistance of the aire."

Under the heading of magnetism, we again find similar proposals. Most material he mentioned in 'Questiones' are in fact the problems which he later focused on during his career in science, and was a brief description of how he would attack each problem. Unfortunately, no documented records exist showing whether Newton did in fact follow up these matters.

Newton's enquiries regarding magnetic perpetual motion

1. The motion of any magneticall ray may bee knowne by attracting a needle in a corke on water.
2. Whither a magneticall pendulum is perpendicular to the Horizon or not, & whither iron is heaviest when impregnated, or when the north pole or southpole is upmost. Coroll. A perpetuall motion .
3. Whither magneticall rays will blow a candle move a red hot copper or iron needle, or passe through a red hot plate of copper or iron
4. A perpetuall motion .
5. Whither a loadestone will not turne around a red hot iron fashioned like wind mill sailes as the wind doth them. Perhaps cold iron may reflect the magn: rays with that pole which shuns the lodestone.

It's quite amazing that Newton recognized the possibility of extracting energy from such gravitational 'rays', even though momentum exchange from electromagnetic waves had not yet been theorized. Once this free work extraction possibility is accepted, background vacuum energy has to be taken into account, and form part of the closed system being analysed. According to today's physics, the zero-point energy is the lowest possible energy that a quantum mechanical physical system may possess (at zero Kelvin) and is the energy of the ground state of the system, wrongly assumed to be of a non-degenerate kind. We also learn that since zero point energy is the lowest possible energy a system can have, this energy cannot be removed from the system and no useful work can be done. In EMRP, the zero point energy is simply a reference point, a degenerate ground state, whose absolute energy level is far from zero, and that a system can be referenced to other levels below this zero point level, thus making available a continuous source of energy to be harnessed for useful work. But, as we always say, the sole validation test of any idea is experiment, and extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. Project Ixion will be our main experimental project for the coming years, our extraordinary proof, and is aimed to show that EMRP gravity theory is in fact the basis of the grand unification theory everybody is searching for, that opens the door to a totally new refreshing science, in which physical constants can be locally shifted from their nominal values at will, and thus, with a little ingenuity, makes clean energy converters a reality. I am not the first researcher to claim such possibility. Here are a few quotes to ponder upon:

'Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic and this we know it is for certain, then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheel work of nature.'
Nikola Tesla, 1932

'It is possible, and even probable, that there will be, in time, other resources of energy opened up, of which we have no knowledge now. We may even find ways of applying forces such as magnetism or gravity for driving machinery without using any other means. Such realizations, though highly improbable, are not impossible. An example will best convey an idea of what we can hope to attain and what we can never attain. Imagine a disk of some homogeneous material turned perfectly true and arranged to turn in frictionless bearings on a horizontal shaft above the ground. This disk, being under the above conditions perfectly balanced, would rest in any position. Now, it is possible that we may learn how to make such a disk rotate continuously and perform work by the force of gravity without any further effort on our part; but it is perfectly impossible for the disk to turn and to do work without any force from the outside. If it could do so, it would be what is designated scientifically as a "perpetuum mobile," a machine creating its own motive power. To make the disk rotate by the force of gravity we have only to invent a screen against this force. By such a screen we could prevent this force from acting on one half of the disk, and the rotation of the latter would follow. At least, we cannot deny such a possibility until we know exactly the nature of the force of gravity. Suppose that this force were due to a movement comparable to that of a stream of air passing from above toward the center of the earth. The effect of such a stream upon both halves of the disk would be equal, and the latter would not rotate ordinarily; but if one half should be guarded by a plate arresting the movement, then it would turn..'
Nikola Tesla, 1900

'The attractive features of the cosmic rays is their constancy. They shower down on us throughout the whole 24 hours, and if a power plant is developed to use their power it will not require devices for storing energy as would be necessary with devices using wind, tide or sunlight.'
Nikola Tesla, 1932

'There are types of energy which lie outside the electromagnetic spectrum. Unfortunately, these research efforts have not been given recognition. For the most part, they have been performed by individuals without any support, whose work lies at the threshold of present-day science, and who are years ahead of science which is already established.'
Edgar Dean Mitchell, Ph.D, astronaut in Apollo 14 mission


'In our search for a new energy source, many of us know that the aether with its hidden energy is the only hope we have of succeeding in that quest. Modern physics views the vacuum of empty space not as a void but as a plenum of randomly fluctuating electromagnetic fields known as the zero-point energy'
Dr. Harold Aspden


'In the second place our result shows that, according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity and to which we have already frequently referred, cannot claim any unlimited validity. A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position'
Albert Einstein


'Therefore I thought in 1905 that in physics one should not speak of the ether at all. This judgement was too radical though as we shall see with the next considerations about the general theory of relativity. It moreover remains, as before, allowed to assume a space-filling medium if one can refer to electromagnetic fields (and thus also for sure matter) as the condition thereof'.
Albert Einstein - Grundgedanken und Methoden der Relativitätstheorie in ihrer Entwicklung dargestellt, 1920


'A material Particle: A body so small that, for the purpose of our investigation, the distances between its different parts maybe neglected, is called a material particle. Thus in certain astronomical investigations the planets, and even the sun, maybe regarded each as a material particle, because the difference of the actions of different parts of these bodies does not come to our notice. But we cannot treat them as material particles when we investigate their rotation. Even an atom, when we consider it as capable of rotation, must be regarded as consisting of many material particles. The diagram of a particle is of course a mathematical point, which has no configuration.'.
Maxwell Clerk - Matter and motion,1920


'I believe that I have really found the relationship between gravitation and electricity, assuming that the Miller experiments are based on a fundamental error. Otherwise, the whole relativity theory collapses like a house of cards.'
Albert Einstein, in a letter to Robert Millikan, June 1921

'My opinion about Miller's experiments is the following. ... Should the positive result be confirmed, then the special theory of relativity and with it the general theory of relativity, in its current form, would be invalid. Experimentum summus judex. Only the equivalence of inertia and gravitation would remain, however, they would have to lead to a significantly different theory.'
Albert Einstein, in a letter to Edwin E. Slosson, July 1925


'The effect of ether-drift has persisted throughout. After considering all the possible sources of error, there always remained a positive effect.'
Dayton Miller,1928


'The principal attraction of the theory of relativity is that it constitutes a logical unity. If any single one of its consequences proves to be inexact, it must be abandoned'
Albert Einstein - How I see the World, 1939


'Whenever a physical theory is revised or transformed, it is revealed that, nearly always, the observation of one or several facts which could not fit within the framework of the theory in its then current form is at the base of the changes. The facts always remain the keystone on which the stability of any theory depends, no matter how important it may be...For a theoretician really worth of the name, it may be said in passing that nothing could be more interesting than a fact which runs counter to a theory until then held to be sound; for him, the real work begins at that point.'
Max Planck - Introduction to Physics, 1941


'You imagine that I look back on my life's work with calm satisfaction. But from nearby it looks quite different. There is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm, and I feel uncertain whether I am in general on the right track.'
Albert Einstein, on his 70th birthday, in a letter to Maurice Solovine, 28 March 1949


'I have now struggled with this basic problem of electricity for more than twenty years, and have become quite discouraged, though without being able to let go of it. I am convinced that a completely new and enlightening inspiration is needed... We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them'
Albert Einstein


The following quotes show how paradigms can affect even the most brilliant minds:

'There is no likelihood man can ever tap the power of the atom. The glib supposition of utilizing atomic energy when our coal has run out is a completely unscientific Utopian dream, a childish bug-a-boo. Nature has introduced a few fool-proof devices into the great majority of elements that constitute the bulk of the world, and they have no energy to give up in the process of disintegration.'
Robert A. Millikan, 1928 in his speech to the Chemists Club NY


'Any one who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine'
Ernest Rutherford, 1933


'One should not take this vacuum energy too literally, however, because the free-field theory is just a mathematical tool to help us understand what we are really interested in: the interacting theory. Only the interacting theory is supposed to correspond directly to reality. Because the vacuum state of the interacting theory is the state of least energy in reality, there is no way to extract the vacuum energy and use it for anything.'
John Baez, 1997 on SciAm board

Project Ixion is a clean energy generator, presently in its final (Phase III) development stage. Preliminary tests, performed under controlled laboratory environment, have already proven positive, predictable and easily replicable. We do have all experimental evidence required as a proof of concept, evidence which shows consistent measurable extraction of vacuum energy in the form of kinetic energy from a vacuum energy differential setup.

What are its implications?

The introduction of such a new clean energy source will be revolutionary, and will change everyones life style on the planet. The invention or better, the discovery will rank with fire, and the wheel and will definetely impact the history of humanity for the years to come, and science will automatically gain better knowledge on magnetism and gravitation leading to an avalanche of new discoveries and new applications, including artificial life technologies. There will not be a single industry which would not be affected. Air pollution coming mainly from our present oil and coal burning power stations will be history, and humanity shall live in a cleaner and healthier environement. The role of present fuel business like oil, coal and nuclear sources will no longer be a load on our taxes. The utility business can still provide the basic network of power transmission, but the users will only have to pay to cover the cable maintanance costs and not the fuel charges. Air, sea, and land travelling will drastically change, both in performance, and economy. Water pumping in remote areas will no longer depend on wind and sun resources. A clean energy generator based on zero point energy is inherently more reliable, and powerful. Topping up our car's fuel tank, or importing coal or oil to power our power stations will be considered as events of the dark ages. Manufacturing of new zero point generators will take place old and absolete industries, and will create a new competitive market, developing multitudes of new jobs. Most probably, the change over will happen in just a few years without much planning and somehow without much control and restrictions. The world we live in will be drastically change in a matter of a year or two, during which many of the companies and things that have till now been almost part of our life will disappear, whilst being replaced by newer companies, gadgets to accompany us in our new future, the one everybody deserves. However one must keep in mind that with such great technological advancement, a greater responsability is required, for, as with all inventions, such technology could as well become the main cause of our race extinction if improperly handled or misused. In fact, holding back such a technology from the general public might, as bad as it may sound, be the only way to prevent such disaster from happening. A dilemma is thus created whether or not one has to suppress such technology in view of the present need for a cleaner energy source, for the sake of avoiding the risk of greater disasters.

This is no perpetual motion or overunity device, although quite a few changes in the current physics have to be made to accommodate its principle of operation, otherwise it could easily but wrongly be categorized as such. For those who do not consider the existence of vacuum energy, this engine would seem to perform magic, by perpetually creating energy out of nothing. However, once vacuum energy is better understood, this machine can be modelled as a simple heat engine. The input is ambient vacuum energy, the output is purely mechanical. This mechanical energy can then be converted into electrical energy using any of the present technologies, by simply coupling to its main rotating shaft. This project will cost about $20,000, and will be financed at our own expenses, as with all the rest of our projects. The operation of this engine cannot be explained using today's mainstream physics, since systems are considered as closed systems which cannot interact with vacuum energy, but can be fully and easily understood by a young child, with the theories I have put forward to the public on this website. The aimed features of the final engine are:

Fuel : Vacuum energy present everywhere

Engine : VE Class EM

Output : From a few watts to kW depending on physical parameters

Exhaust emissions : None

Radiation emissions : None

Cooling requirements : None

Operating lifetime : Theoretically eternal, practically until something breaks

Principle of operation : Vacuum energy converter by offsetting vacuum energy reference level

Running cost per kW hour : None

Too good to be true? We'll see! We shall hopefully be able to complete the final stage of this project by end of 2009 and we are presently very excited with our results which we consider to be our biggest achievement. The goal of being able to present an engine and not just a simple validation experiment is that of avoiding such a discovery to be discounted for a wierd anomaly instead of something revolutionary to the human race.

Hypothetical exotic matter

Today's science teaches us close to nothing about the properties of mass. There are at least three conceptually distinct quantities called mass: 'inertial' mass (m_i), that is, the mass of an object measured by its resistance to acceleration, 'active' gravitational mass (m_a),that is, the source of the gravitational field, and 'passive' gravitational mass (m_g),that is, the amount of force produced in response to gravity. Einstein's weak equivalence principle postulates that inertial mass must equal passive gravitational mass; while the law of conservation of momentum requires that active and passive gravitational mass must be identical. Experimental evidence to date shows that this is true within the margin of error we can measure mass, only that few are aware that the margin of error for any experiment involving mass is by far greater than that we are used to in other scientific fields. And this is mainly due to the fact that science has been yet unable to define an accurate way to measure mass, or to define it in the first place. For such known reasons, scientists have not ruled out the possible existence of particles which go against the behavior of normal particles, and have grouped such hypothetical particles under the tag 'exotic matter'.

Hypothetical particles type I

In 1957, British physicist Sir Hermann Bondi investigated the effects of a hypothetical negative mass. Bondi pointed out that when general relativity is considered purely as a theory of gravity, mass never actually appears. It first appears when the equations are solved in a way devised by the German physicist K. Schwartzschild, in which mass appears simply as a constant of integration. Bondi noticed that this mass constant could be made either positive or negative. He was able to show that when mass is made negative, both the inertial and the gravitational masses are reversed. The results of Bondi's calculations can be summarized in a few words: a big positive mass attracts all nearby masses whether positive or negative; and a big negative mass repels all nearby masses whether positive or negative. He pointed out that this does not entail a logical contradiction, as long as all three forms of mass are all negative, but that the assumption of negative mass involves some counter-intuitive form of motion. He also noted, that if two masses, equal in magnitude but opposite in polarity, are set on a circular track, they will accelerate perpetually.

Thus if an object is made up of a mix of positive and negative mass particles, in the ratio of x:y, then, from Newton's second law we have:

F = xm_ia - ym_ia

Thus it can be seen that for an object with partly negative inertial mass, its resistance to acceleration becomes less than that for totally positive mass of the same quantity of matter. For a totally negative mass, the body would accelerate in the opposite direction of the applied force.
If one were to treat inertial mass m_i, passive gravitational mass m_p, and active gravitational mass m_a distinctly, then Newton's law of universal gravitation would take the form

m_ia= G {m_pm_a}/r²

Thus objects having the same polarity for m_p and m_a, whether positive or negative will attract, whilst those having opposite mass polarity will repel. To date, no such matter has shown the above hypothetical behavior, not even antimatter.

This behavior would lend itself to the production of antigravitational material such as the science fiction material known as 'cavorite'. When positioned between two positive masses, it would decrease the gravitational attraction between them. In EMRP, we know that the only way to produce such effect on the same setup would be to replace 'cavorite' by a powerful and very high frequency energy source. Also, if we consider matter as a standing wave of energy, negative mass would require the existence of negative energy.



Hypothetical particles type II

In 2006, I have successfully derived the nuclear magic numbers, using my own non-mainstream model which I refer to as the variable phase nuclear (VPN) model. Despite, the simplicity and common sense of this model, the whole model comes at the expense of dumping the whole standard model of the atom, and that's the reason you won't read about it in your favourite science magazine. The model treats matter as having both real and imaginary components making up the quantity we measure as the weight of a body. The weight of a body can therefore be described as a complex impedance force W_Z as having both real and imaginary components, analogous to a complex voltage signal. In such model, matter is analogous to antennas with their polar radiation pattern, and impedance. Its weight is composed of a complex value which can be a combination of inductive and resistive forces. The capacitive component results in antimatter and is not discussed here. In general, any weight can therefore take on values in the form W_R + jW_L - jW_C, j being the engineering notation used for imaginary numbers, and equal to sqrt(-1), and Re:Im is the ratio of real to imaginary components which define its phase angle in exactly the same way it does for electrical circuits. Thus, Newton's law of motion takes the form:

F= ma = mg = W_Z = W_R + jW_L - jW_C

Each of the three types of forces, inductive, resistive, capacitive, are characterized by a different amount of ZPE dissipation within the matter under the influence of electromagnetic radiation. The power dissipated by a load is referred to as true power. True power is symbolized by the letter P and is measured in the unit of Watts (W). Power merely absorbed and returned in load due to its reactive properties is referred to as reactive power. Reactive power is loss-less and is symbolized by the letter Q and is measured in the unit of Volt-Amps-Reactive (VAR). The total power in a combined resistive and reactive load is partly dissipated and partly absorbed/returned and is referred to as apparent power. Apparent power is symbolized by the letter S and is measured in the unit of Volt-Amps (VA). These three types of power are trigonometrically related to one another. In a right triangle, P = adjacent length, Q = opposite length, and S = hypotenuse length. The opposite angle is equal to the circuit's impedance (Z) phase angle. Whilst mass is defined by the ST system of units as being purely inductive, the measured weight (force) or gravitational PE, is not only composed of the inductive components, but composed of the apparent component which is the resultant of both resistive and reactive components. In other words, one can make a particle weigh more than a purely inductive mass, by increasing its resistive/dissipative component. Please understand, that this increase in apparent weight is not being accomplished by some magic trick increasing mass but by shifting the phase between velocity and force generated by radiation pressure in a similar fashion we can shift the phase angle between current and voltage in electrical systems. If you find this somewhat confusing, I suggest you go through both the EMRP section and the ST system of units, until everything is clear.

Unlike Bondi's hypothetical negative mass, matter in the VPN results in a real and an imaginary part describing its gravitational attraction. Mass is defined as purely inductive, and so, its capacitive component which would lead to negative mass must be zero. So, the lack of evidence for negative weights, does not contradict any expected result from the VPN model, in fact the VPN model states that mass should always be positive. This model implies that the inertial force can be varied from a totally real value to a totally imaginary value, keeping the same value for its magnitude, and hence its internal energy level, since the magnitude for F when say, Im=0, Re=10 is the same as that for Im=10 and Re=0, even though the MASS is zero for the first case. Both masses will however read 10 Newtons on a measuring balance. Note that although mass (defined as the inductive part) is not being conserved, the net mass-energy is. One can relate the imaginary component of the force as acting orthogonaly to the applied force. Note that unlike Bondi's hypothesis, our particle does not offer any bizarre behavior such as accelerating in the opposite direction of the applied force, nor does it result in a perpetual motion by simply setting up two particles on a circular track. VPN still offers some interesting effects like an increase in photon angular momentum orthogonal to the direction of travel, which is not so uncommon in reality. Also, hypothetical particles of type II, are not some exotic material like cavorite waiting to be discovered, but simply any piece of matter from our known periodic table.

How it works

The concept of the device is simple. The EMRP cores, made of hypothetical particles type II as described above, work as long as there is a ZPE gradient. According to EMRP, ZPE is NOT the lowest energy level, and an energy gradient and hence a force field can be generated by the effect of shielding. This means that all devices whose internal mechanism is fueled by ZPE (all particles, all stars, the whole universe, together with all the so called 'universal constants'), will behave differently at different points within this energy gradient. Following some hick-ups we had during phase II due to unwanted torque generated due to a combination of minor shaft flexing and bearing anomalies, we have now reached the stage at which our experimental results clearly show that we finally found the proper way to utilise the ZPE gradient and enhance the effect to do useful work. A radiation pressure imbalance over the arms of the rotor results in direct conversion to mechanical motion. Research work and experimental work are being done in parallel, and during the past months, many plans had to be binned, to be replaced by new ideas and hardware. Anyway, we have done our best to re-use most of the materials from one stage to the other so that the final goal would be still achieved more or less within the same timeframe as originally planned. The magnitude of the effect is now over 10 times larger than we had ever measured during phase I and II, and are now confident enough about our success.


Photo Gallery

If you wish to join in our discussions


Click to join Blaze Labs Research Yahoo! Group

^{Note, we approve membership based on the comment one leaves on his join request form,
so please do fill in the comment field.
If you have been referred to by a group member, let us know.}